{"id":504001,"date":"2025-03-12T14:38:46","date_gmt":"2025-03-12T18:38:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/?p=504001"},"modified":"2025-03-12T14:38:46","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T18:38:46","slug":"bare-trust-debacle-began-with-burdensome-legislation-taypayers-ombudsperson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/news\/industry-news\/bare-trust-debacle-began-with-burdensome-legislation-taypayers-ombudsperson\/","title":{"rendered":"Bare trust debacle began with burdensome legislation: Taypayers’ Ombudsperson"},"content":{"rendered":"

A review of how the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) administered the 2023 filing requirements for bare trusts finds that the main issue was burdensome legislation.<\/p>\n

“[T]he primary barriers the CRA faced in its administration of the bare trust filing requirements were not administrative but legislative, because the concept of bare trusts in the legislative wording was too broad,” says a report<\/a> from the Office of the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson, dated March 5. It describes the legislation as “burdensome.”<\/p>\n

Expanded reporting requirements for bare trusts were supposed to kick in for the 2023 tax year. But after the new rules sparked widespread confusion, the CRA provided a filing exemption for bare trusts just days ahead of the tax filing deadline.<\/p>\n

“Taxpayers and representatives should not have been left to spend months trying to understand the legislation when the CRA ultimately exempted bare trusts from the filing requirements,” the report says, noting that some tax professionals weren’t comfortable billing clients following the announced exemption.<\/p>\n

“All of this was wasted time and effort,” the report says.<\/p>\n

Despite the filing exemption for 2023, the CRA told this publication in early July 2024 that 52,000 trust returns had been filed for bare trusts for 2023<\/a>. These taxpayers can’t be compensated for their legal and accounting costs, because the Income Tax Act includes no provision for the CRA to do so. As such, “many may have lost confidence in the tax system,” the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson report says. (The report also notes that these taxpayers’ bare trust information won’t be removed from the CRA’s databases, because the agency has a legal obligation to retain the information.)<\/p>\n

The review overseen by the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson, Fran\u00e7ois Boileau, considers the CRA’s role in administering and enforcing the trust reporting legislation (as opposed to Finance’s role in creating it). The resulting recommendations are that the CRA review its collaboration with stakeholders and with Finance Canada as well as its communication with taxpayers, and also assess whether a unique filing form for bare trusts is needed for easier reporting.<\/p>\n

Leadup to the review<\/h2>\n

Expanded trust reporting legislation, aimed at transparency of beneficial ownership information in order to counter tax evasion, passed in 2022 and was effective for trusts with year-ends on Dec. 31, 2023, and after. With the rules, the majority of trusts, including bare trusts, are required to file a T3 return on time or face penalties. (Under previous legislation, generally only trusts with taxes payable for the year or those that disposed of capital property needed to file an annual trust income tax return.)<\/p>\n

In a bare trust arrangement, the trustee generally holds legal title to the trust property but is unable to take any action without direction from all beneficiaries. Examples of bare trusts could include co-signed mortgages and joint bank accounts.<\/p>\n

“[M]any taxpayers may not know they are in a bare trust arrangement,” the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson report says. “This could be a parent who controls their child\u2019s bank account or co-signing their child\u2019s mortgage, or a child who is helping their aging parents by helping them manage their bank account.”<\/p>\n

Given the challenges with the expanded reporting, the CRA provided a blanket filing exemption to bare trusts for the 2023 tax year<\/a> at the end of March 2024, mere days before the trust return filing deadline of April 2, 2024. The last-minute reversal led to widespread frustration<\/a> among tax practitioners and taxpayers, prompting the review<\/a> by the Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson.<\/p>\n

“The public wanted answers, and we wanted to examine if the CRA\u2019s service-related processes could be improved,” the report detailing the review says.<\/p>\n

CRA communication failures<\/h2>\n

While the CRA took steps to communicate the new trust reporting legislation, the agency was “limited in the guidance it could provide [about bare trusts] because it had no legal authority to provide legal advice to taxpayers,” the report says.<\/p>\n

“Whether or not a particular arrangement is a bare trust depends on the specific facts of each situation, as well as the applicable law,” it says. “In addition, the legal principles applicable to trust relationships vary depending on the relevant province or territory.”<\/p>\n

Also, the CRA didn’t provide “relatable” and “clear” examples of bare trusts to help taxpayers, the report says. It also calls out a lack of timeliness, saying the CRA released information on bare trusts one year after the legislation passed. The lack of timely communication contravened certain taxpayer rights and increased compliance costs.<\/p>\n

“We heard of small businesses that spent thousands of dollars on hiring new staff, training employees, and filing returns for clients” and “that some tax preparers hired lawyers to support their team and help make sense of their clients\u2019 compliance obligations,” the report says. “It was not helpful that the CRA provided information after tax preparers had already completed preparations and training for the upcoming tax season.”<\/p>\n

The report also questions the length of time it took the CRA to consider a filing exemption. “Specifically, we do not know why the CRA did not provide an exemption in November 2023 instead of approving penalty relief,” it says. “The justification provided to senior CRA executives for the penalty relief did not appear to differ greatly from what was provided for the filing exemption.”<\/p>\n

Once the exemption was finally announced, bare trusts that had already filed “did so for no reason, and in many cases at great expense,” the report says. By March 12, 2024, 4,652 bare trusts had filed, it says. (On March 12, the CRA said it would apply a gross negligence penalty<\/a> in only the most egregious cases in which a bare trust failed to file.)<\/p>\n

Between the exemption announcement on March 28, 2024, and Aug. 1, 2024, 9,665 bare trust T3 returns were filed \u2014 18% of all bare trust T3s filed for 2023. The post-exemption filing was potentially because the exemption was communicated via a tax tip rather than a news release, the report says. It also notes that the CRA’s waiving of late-filing penalties for bare trusts in November 2023 and its subsequent 11th-hour exemption announcement could have affected trust in the agency.<\/p>\n

“The CRA has to be more careful in what it does so that the trust it has built up with Canadians is not eroded by changing its position at the last minute,” the report says. “It informed taxpayers when it announced the exemption that it would work with Finance Canada to provide clarity in the coming months \u2014 taxpayers could be served better. Clarity should have been provided to taxpayers well in advance of the filing deadline.”<\/p>\n

Overall, the CRA didn’t minimize the time, effort and costs that taxpayers had to incur to comply with the new filing requirements, the review found. The report recommends that the CRA determine, by June 30, 2025, whether to introduce a unique form for bare trusts’ filing requirements. The five-page T3 and two-page Schedule 15 “would be daunting for many who are not accountants or lawyers,” it says.<\/p>\n

It also notes that not all information requested on the T3 may be relevant for a particular bare trust. “It may have been more helpful if the CRA were to have unique T3 returns for bare trusts that would only include the relevant fields,” it says.<\/p>\n

The report also recommends that the agency conduct an internal review, by March 31, 2026, of how it collaborates with stakeholders when legislative amendments have been enacted, and also review \u2014 by the same date \u2014 how it works with Finance when administering a legislative proposal could increase taxpayers’ compliance costs.<\/p>\n

“The CRA should consult with stakeholders early on, even before legislation comes into force, to ensure it is aware of any feedback and concerns there may be so that it can develop an action plan to address them in a timely manner,” the report says. The CRA only met with stakeholders six months after the new trust rules became law, it notes.<\/p>\n

The CRA’s interactions with Finance should be considered in the context of compliance costs and legislative clarity, the report says.<\/p>\n

It also recommends that the CRA review, by March 31, 2026, how it communicates updates to taxpayers through tax tips and news releases.<\/p>\n

Finally, it suggests that the CRA create an “adaptable guide,” by March 31, 2027, to help it streamline how it administers changes to tax legislation. The guide would ensure changes to tax and benefit information are released in a timely matter and understood by the average taxpayer, it says.<\/p>\n

The Taxpayers’ Ombudsperson review was conducted in consultation with stakeholders, including CPA Canada, taxpayers and the CRA. Ryan Minor, tax director with CPA Canada, said in an email that the organization was “pleased” with the report’s recommendations.<\/p>\n

Bare trusts and proposed amendments<\/h2>\n

On Aug. 12, 2024, technical amendments to the trust reporting legislation, which effectively removed the filing requirement for 2024 and exempted more bare trusts from the expanded trust reporting rules,<\/a> were published for consultation.<\/p>\n

Because it was unlikely a bill with the proposed amendments would receive royal assent before tax practitioners began planning for tax season, in October 2024 the CRA announced a filing exemption for bare trusts for the 2024 tax year (unless the agency directly requests a trust to file).<\/p>\n

“We hope the final legislation will be available well in advance of the deadline for filing returns, giving the CRA sufficient time to educate the public on their obligations,” Minor said, referring to the 2025 tax year.<\/p>\n

He also noted that during the consultation, the Joint Committee on Taxation of the Canadian Bar Association and CPA Canada<\/a> asked for “more workable exemptions covering common low-risk situations.”<\/p>\n

Under the draft legislation<\/a>, a trust \u2014 including a bare trust \u2014 is exempt from a filing requirement when all trustees and beneficiaries are related to each other; the property’s fair market value (FMV) doesn\u2019t exceed $250,000; and the trust\u2019s assets consist of only cash, GICs, mutual funds, personal-use property and securities traded on a designated exchange (as well as certain other assets).<\/p>\n

The draft legislation retains the filing exemption for trusts with a FMV of $50,000 or less, but no longer restricts the assets these trusts can hold to be eligible for the exemption. In addition, the trustees and beneficiaries don’t need to be related to be eligible for the $50,000 exemption.<\/p>\n

The proposed legislation also provides a filing exemption to an arrangement in which individuals are on legal title to real property that would be the principal residence of one or more legal owners, and all legal owners are related. The provision would be effective for trusts with year-ends of Dec. 31, 2025, and later.<\/p>\n

Certain trusts are excluded from the expanded reporting rules, including graduated rate estates, qualified disability trusts, mutual fund trusts and registered plans, trusts in existence for less than three months, and trusts with less than $50,000 in asset value.<\/p>\n

With files from Rudy Mezzatta.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Report outlines CRA communication failures that resulted in wasted time, effort, from taxpayers<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145539,"featured_media":468139,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2312,2318],"tags":[3274,2928,2476,107259,107540],"yst_prominent_words":[104186,104185,100669,69111,57728,12315,11674,6581,6272,6270,2170],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504001"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145539"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=504001"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":504434,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504001\/revisions\/504434"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/468139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=504001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=504001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=504001"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=504001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}