which are seen running into the tens of millions of dollars<\/a>) and the plan for recouping those costs, which will come first from certain dealers but ultimately from investors.<\/p>\nThe secrecy exposes the fundamental contradiction at the heart of self-regulation. While SROs purport to operate in the public interest, at the end of the day they are private organizations that answer chiefly to their members. This tension has played out in court when investors have sought to hold SROs accountable for losses suffered at the hands of investment dealers, only to find that investors have no standing in the contractual relationship between the SROs and their members.<\/p>\n
While the provincial regulators delegate authority to the SROs, oversee their work and supervise them through their recognition orders, the line of accountability from the SROs to the public that regulators purport to serve is long and imprecise.<\/p>\n
In theory, the SROs answer to the provincial regulators, who answer to their respective governments \u2014 which ultimately answer to the public. But in practice, the chain of command is too fractured for meaningful public accountability. The SROs can prioritize their own interests \u2014 those of their executives, employees and members \u2014 ahead of the public\u2019s with little fear of consequences.<\/p>\n
The initial pitch for SRO reform was couched in high-minded rhetoric about enhancing investor protection and serving the public interest. The reality so far has fallen short of those ideals.<\/p>\n
Now that the scary part of the process \u2014 the possibility that plans could be derailed by a dealer vote \u2014 is over, hopefully the regulators can focus on their promises of enhanced regulation in the public interest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Editorial: Regulatory secrecy prevented public scrutiny of the planned transformation \u2014 including concessions made to dealers to earn support for the merger<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":73592,"featured_media":401504,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3014,3013],"tags":[2638],"yst_prominent_words":[5981,56815,27778,13231,12318,8394,8039,6752,6748,6694,6690,6076,12,5934,5377,5034,4996,4725,4711,14],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452570"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/73592"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=452570"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452570\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":452590,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/452570\/revisions\/452590"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/401504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=452570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=452570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=452570"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=452570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}