{"id":326571,"date":"2007-10-15T14:07:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-15T19:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/uncategorized\/news-41381\/"},"modified":"2007-10-15T14:07:00","modified_gmt":"2007-10-15T19:07:00","slug":"news-41381","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/newspaper_\/building-your-business-newspaper\/news-41381\/","title":{"rendered":"Green car initiatives not having a positive impact, critics say"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Harper govern-ment may have scored political points with the introduction of its \u201cgreen\u201d car rebate in the spring budget. But, critics say, the effect the carrot is having on the environment is minimal, at best.
Starting this fall, people who have bought new cars since March 20 with fuel consumption of 6.5 litres or less per 100 kilometres will receive a rebate of up to $2,000. The incentive also applies to minivans, sport utility vehicles and light trucks with fuel consumption of 8.3 litres or less per 100 km.
On the flip side, the government is penalizing those who buy gas-guzzlers by imposing an environmental levy. The penalty starts at $1,000 for vehicles with fuel consumption ratings of at least 13 litres per 100 km but less than 14 litres over the same distance. The levy increases by $1,000 for each litre per 100 km above the threshold, to a maximum of $4,000.
Ottawa estimates it will spend up to $160 million over the next two years on the incentives, while receiving $215 million back from the levy.
According to Robin Browne, senior communications advisor for Transport Canada in Ottawa, the rebate program is on track and cheques will be issued to qualifying Canadians in the coming weeks. \u201cWe\u2019ve certainly had a lot of interest in it. Folks are calling and saying, \u2018Hey, when do I get my cheque?\u2019\u201d he says. \u201cIt\u2019s all about encouraging Canadians to buy environmentally friendly, fuel-efficient vehicles.\u201d
Yet Phil Edmonston, author of the popular Lemon-Aid<\/i> auto-buying guides, is critical of the concept. Although such programs encourage consumers to consider purchasing more fuel-efficient cars, he says, they don\u2019t do much to reduce net emissions. The government would have been better off providing incentives for people to improve the fuel efficiency of the vehicles they already own.
\u201cBy hitching the rebate wagon to the sale of new vehicles, the government is actually creating additional pollution and dependence upon oil. We have too many vehicles on the road as it is,\u201d Edmonston says. \u201cAttaching rebates to fuel-efficient new cars is like tackling overpopulation by giving grants to families that have small kids.\u201d
The mathematics is pretty simple, Edmonston explains: improving an existing vehicle to burn less fuel is still one vehicle on the road. But if everyone were to go out and buy a new fuel-efficient car, it would double the active vehicle population.
\u201cI don\u2019t care if the new car gets 100 miles to the gallon, it\u2019s still an additional gallon and additional pollution,\u201d he says.
Meanwhile, the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association is in favour of incentives that reward technology and help bring more efficient vehicles to market.
For example, the rebate bridges the gap between the $30,000 price-tag of a hybrid vehicle of a particular model and that of the non-hybrid version, which has a sticker price of $22,000. \u201cMost Canadians will opt for the less expensive model,\u201d says Huw Williams, the CADA\u2019s public and government affairs director in Ottawa. So, in this case, \u201cincentives make sense.\u201d
However, the CADA does not support the incentive being based on fuel economy. \u201cThat\u2019s a pretty arbitrary line to draw,\u201d says Williams. \u201cSome vehicles surpass [the 6.5-litre threshold] slightly because of safety requirements. It\u2019s very controversial in the market.\u201d
He says the government should eliminate the GST on new vehicles instead to order to persuade people to move to cleaner automobiles.
Although the final numbers have yet to come in, preliminary figures show sales of SUVs have not fallen off since the March budget, Williams says, adding that the government has to consider that it makes sense for many families to drive a larger vehicle to ferry kids to hockey games and soccer practices.
General Motors Canada echoes that sentiment in a recent report, in which it says there has been no positive environmental impact from the government program. In fact, the report shows that SUVs drawing the maximum federal levy of $4,000 have outsold those without the penalties.
\u201cThe Canadian SUV market has continued to grow, unabated by feebate levies,\u201d the report says. \u201cThe full range of competitive marketplace incentives nullified or made irrelevant any impact of feebates. It\u2019s like pouring a thimble into a river.\u201d
In addition, thousands of consumers have been frustrated by not being able to access forms to apply for these rebates, the report says.
@page_break@Another problem is that current rebates only apply to 2006 and 2007 model vehicles and don\u2019t include 2008 vehicles, many of which were rolled out by the end of summer, the report adds.\tIE<\/b>
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Despite the federal government\u2019s efforts, the green levy has not curtailed the sale of gas-guzzling SUVs so far this year<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3013,3018],"tags":[3159],"yst_prominent_words":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326571"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/326571\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=326571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=326571"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.investmentexecutive.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=326571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}