The British Columbia Securities Commission has decided to go ahead with a hearing concerning governance at the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada, despite the fact that the firm that sought the hearing has dropped its case.
Last fall the BCSC decided to hold a hearing into issues raise Partners in Planning Financial Services Ltd. concerning:
– the adoption of a new MFDA bylaw;
– the participation of certain directors in the drafting of that bylaw; and
– the proxy solicitation process used to approve the new bylaw.
However, in April, after the MFDA agreed to review certain policies, the firm formally withdrew its application. In a joint submission, Partners in Planning, the MFDA, and the executive director of the BCSC agreed that it was no longer in the public interest for the proceeding to continue.
“The resolution of this matter… provides transparent solutions to the issues identified by the commission,” they said in their submission. “Furthermore, it appears that the issues identified by the panel have become moot. In light of the agreement by the MFDA to the steps outlined above, and the current composition of the board, there is no longer a tangible dispute between the parties.”
However, the BCSC panel has decided to proceed with the hearing anyway.
“It is essential that [regulators] operate, and are seen to operate, in a manner that leaves no room to question the integrity of their governance procedures and practices. It is essential that any allegations that could raise those questions be dealt with thoroughly and openly,” the panel says.
The panel says that leaving unanswered questions about the credibility of the MFDA could impugn both its credibility and that of the regulatory system overall.
The BCSC will continue with the hearing. Although Partners in Planning will no longer have to participate, the MFDA and executive director of the BCSC are being asked for submissions on the issues raised by the firm.
A date for the hearing has yet to be set.
Larry Waite, president and CEO of the MFDA, said in an email to his staff, “I’m surprised and disappointed by the panel’s decision.”
IE
Latest news In From the Regulators
With Trump’s return, Gensler to leave SEC
Departure clears the way for Republicans to name new top regulator
- By: James Langton
- November 21, 2024 November 21, 2024
- 15:00
Tribunal rules crypto company’s takeover defence offside
Cease trading shareholder rights plan in the public interest, panel finds
- By: James Langton
- November 21, 2024 November 21, 2024
- 09:10
Basel III capital reforms get push from global regulators
Call to fully implement global rules follows recent delays, revisions
- By: James Langton
- November 20, 2024 November 20, 2024
- 17:01
Banks’ compensation models need work: FSB
March 2023 bank failures echoed lessons on incentives from financial crisis
- By: James Langton
- November 20, 2024 November 20, 2024
- 16:48
Today's top stories
U.S. will enter a recession in 2025: BCA Research
S&P 500 will fall to 4,100, Canada will also see a recession, Peter Berezin forecasts
- By: Kevin Press
- November 22, 2024 November 22, 2024
- 12:55
It’s official: DFSA credential no longer qualifies for FA title use
RBC still requires the credential in retail branches, FSRA provides date for forthcoming title protection review
- By: Michelle Schriver
- November 22, 2024 November 22, 2024
- 12:41
Protecting client interests in the AI age
Here's how advisors can prevent AI hallucinations, privacy breaches
- By: Jonathan Got
- November 22, 2024 November 22, 2024
- 12:08
Ex-fund rep banned for ‘obvious’ conflict of interest
Rep arranged a loan from one client to another to repay a "gang" debt
- By: James Langton
- November 22, 2024 November 22, 2024
- 15:55